<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web-conferences Woes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ovenell-carter.com/2009/03/14/web-conferences-woes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ovenell-carter.com/2009/03/14/web-conferences-woes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 18:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mollybob</title>
		<link>http://www.ovenell-carter.com/2009/03/14/web-conferences-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>mollybob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovenell-carter.com/blog/?p=474#comment-176</guid>
		<description>It sounds like something&#039;s gotten out of hand somewhere! I agree that the role of the moderator is indeed an important one in the situations you&#039;ve mentioned, and that as our level of noise is ever increasing, we need to get better at finding meaning in it. I also like the back channel too and think it has a role, as it always has, it&#039;s just that it&#039;s digital now. I really like hearing the banter on Twitter at conferences, and think it&#039;s not just about gossip, it can also be about people synthesising information, and sharing with those that are absent.  I&#039;ve never been at a conference so huge that the audience takes over via the back channel, living in Australia I&#039;m just happy to have someone give us internet access at a conference, and if the speaker has twitter going that&#039;s just great! (and a rarity). Maybe I&#039;ll be fortunate (or unfortunate) enough to see it happen one day. Social learning in action huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like something&#8217;s gotten out of hand somewhere! I agree that the role of the moderator is indeed an important one in the situations you&#8217;ve mentioned, and that as our level of noise is ever increasing, we need to get better at finding meaning in it. I also like the back channel too and think it has a role, as it always has, it&#8217;s just that it&#8217;s digital now. I really like hearing the banter on Twitter at conferences, and think it&#8217;s not just about gossip, it can also be about people synthesising information, and sharing with those that are absent.  I&#8217;ve never been at a conference so huge that the audience takes over via the back channel, living in Australia I&#8217;m just happy to have someone give us internet access at a conference, and if the speaker has twitter going that&#8217;s just great! (and a rarity). Maybe I&#8217;ll be fortunate (or unfortunate) enough to see it happen one day. Social learning in action huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.ovenell-carter.com/2009/03/14/web-conferences-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovenell-carter.com/blog/?p=474#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Hi Brad,

Appreciate your comments about the distraction of the back channel. For larger sessions, a moderator who specifically handles the chat can be really helpful, so the speaker can concentrate on presenting.

In addition, with Elluminate, you can easily enable/disable chat for any or all participants to better manage traffic during the presentation. However, many participants like the additional &quot;noise,&quot; and I&#039;ve even seen sessions where someone reiterates what the speaker is saying in the chat window.

Here&#039;s a recent Elluminate blog entry that includes some other thoughts on the value of the back channel. http://elluminate.edublogs.org/2009/03/05/the-value-of-the-back-channel/

Keep on Elluminating!

- Beth, Elluminate Goddess of Communication</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad,</p>
<p>Appreciate your comments about the distraction of the back channel. For larger sessions, a moderator who specifically handles the chat can be really helpful, so the speaker can concentrate on presenting.</p>
<p>In addition, with Elluminate, you can easily enable/disable chat for any or all participants to better manage traffic during the presentation. However, many participants like the additional &#8220;noise,&#8221; and I&#8217;ve even seen sessions where someone reiterates what the speaker is saying in the chat window.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a recent Elluminate blog entry that includes some other thoughts on the value of the back channel. <a href="http://elluminate.edublogs.org/2009/03/05/the-value-of-the-back-channel/" rel="nofollow">http://elluminate.edublogs.org/2009/03/05/the-value-of-the-back-channel/</a></p>
<p>Keep on Elluminating!</p>
<p>- Beth, Elluminate Goddess of Communication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing</title>
		<link>http://www.ovenell-carter.com/2009/03/14/web-conferences-woes/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Micalizzi, Dimdim Web Conferencing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 02:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ovenell-carter.com/blog/?p=474#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Brad-

It is possible to disable the public chat for a meeting, but then you lose the meaningful conversation that can accompany/follow the speaker.  I like your suggestion of meeting hosts being able to suspend chat when needed, in the same way people mute all attendees in a conference call to allow the speaker to present without interruption.  I&#039;ve shared it with our product management team.

If there are other ways you feel we can improve, let me know.

Thanks.

-k
Kevin Micalizzi, Community Manager
Dimdim Web Conferencing
  e: kevin@dimdim.com
  twitter: @dimdim
  facebook: dimdim.com/facebook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brad-</p>
<p>It is possible to disable the public chat for a meeting, but then you lose the meaningful conversation that can accompany/follow the speaker.  I like your suggestion of meeting hosts being able to suspend chat when needed, in the same way people mute all attendees in a conference call to allow the speaker to present without interruption.  I&#8217;ve shared it with our product management team.</p>
<p>If there are other ways you feel we can improve, let me know.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>-k<br />
Kevin Micalizzi, Community Manager<br />
Dimdim Web Conferencing<br />
  e: <a href="mailto:kevin@dimdim.com">kevin@dimdim.com</a><br />
  twitter: @dimdim<br />
  facebook: dimdim.com/facebook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
