Goethe for the 2.0 Crowd

Everything has been thought of before; the task is to remember it again.

Suppose Goethe is right: What do we learn about teaching and curriculum by looking backward, instead of forward?

No related posts.

Posted in Community by Braddo / March 1st, 2009 / 4 Comments »

4 Comments

  1. Richard Smith says:

    “Spare the rod and spoil the child?”

    “The Three R’s?”

    The trivium/quadrivium? http://www.gbt.org/text/sayers.html

  2. braddo says:

    OK, point taken. That’s not what I was thinking,
    But I know Sayers essay well and I do think there’s something in the trivium/quadrivium as Sayers remakes it. Or in Hilda Neatby.

    There’s a wisdom to be found in the old stuff, a wisdom that we no longer teach. See Barry Schwartz on TED: http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/barry_schwartz_on_our_loss_of_wisdom.html

  3. Richard Smith says:

    The first two were facetious. Sayers, serious.

  4. braddo says:

    OK, ya got me. But I plead sick for a week and whacked on decongestants

Leave a Reply